Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Outcomes following robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

This study elaborates on previous research to compare length of stay, complication rates, and total cost between patients undergoing robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and conventional total knee arthroplasty (cTKA). We hypothesized that patients undergoing rTKA would have reduced length of stay, lower complication rates, improved perioperative outcomes, and higher total healthcare costs than those undergoing cTKA.

Methods

Data were collected from the National Inpatient Sample Database Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project between the years 2016–2019. Patients undergoing rTKA and cTKA were identified under International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes (ICD-10-CM/PCS). Length of stay, specific complications, and total costs were examined at time point. SPSS (v 27.0 8, IBM Corp. Armonk, NY) was utilized to compare demographic and analytical statistics between rTKA and cTKA. rTKA and cTKA were compared both before and after propensity matching.

Results

17,249 rTKA (3.09%) and 541,122 cTKA (96.91%) were included. Compared to cTKA patients, rTKA patients had reduced average length of stay of 1.91 days (p < 0.001), higher average total cost of $67133.34 (p < 0.001), reduced periprosthetic infection (OR = 0.027, p < 0.001), periprosthetic dislocation (OR = 0.117, p < 0.001), periprosthetic mechanical complication (OR = 0.315, p < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (OR = 0.358, p < 0.001), transfusion (OR = 0.366, p < 0.001), pneumonia (OR = 0.468, p = 0.002), deep vein thrombosis (OR = 0.479, p = 0.001), and blood loss anemia (OR = 0.728, p < 0.001). These differences remained statistically significant even after propensity matching.

Conclusions

This study supports our hypothesis that rTKA is associated with fewer complications, but higher average total cost than cTKA. Our study shows that rTKA can be safely performed in older and sicker patients. Future studies assessing the impacts of these findings on patient reported outcomes would provide further insight into the benefits of rTKA. Furthermore, identifying patient specific factors that place them at risk for increased complications with cTKA as opposed to rTKA could provide surgeons insight on the method of TKA that maximizes patient outcomes while minimizing healthcare cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skou ST, Roos EM, Laursen MB et al (2015) A Randomized, controlled trial of total knee replacement. N Engl J Med 22(17):1597–1606. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1505467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP (2018) Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100(17):1455–1460. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01617. PMID: 30180053

  3. Heo SM, Harris I, Naylor J, Lewin AM (2020) Complications to 6 months following total hip or knee arthroplasty: observations from an Australian clinical outcomes registry. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Sep 10(1):602. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03612-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Jung WB, Park HW, Lee GW (2011) Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(7):1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1400-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, Netravali NA, Bargar WL (2013) Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA [published correction appears in Clin Orthop Relat res. 2012;470(9):2627]. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(1):118–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2407-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF (2002) Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee 9(3):173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-0160(02)00015-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS (2018) Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 100–B(7):930–937. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1449.R1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Liow MHL, Goh GS, Wong MK, Chin PL, Tay DK, Yeo SJ (2017) Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(9):2942–2951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4076-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nogalo C, Meena A, Abermann E, Fink C (2023) Complications and downsides of the robotic total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Mar 31(3):736–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07031-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kayani B, Konan S, Ayuob A, Onochie E, Al-Jabri T, Haddad FS (2019) Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev Oct 4(10):611–617. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.190022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YH, Yoon SH, Park JW (2021) Does Robotic-assisted tka result in better outcome scores or long-term survivorship than conventional TKA? A randomized, controlled trial [published correction appears in Clin Orthop Relat Res. ;479(6):1407]. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478(2):266–275. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000916

  12. Stauss R, Savov P, Tuecking LR, Windhagen H, Ettinger M (2023) Robotic-assisted TKA reduces surgery duration, length of stay and 90-day complication rate of complex TKA to the level of noncomplex TKA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(6):3423–3430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04618-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Archer A, Salem HS, Coppolecchia A, Mont MA (2023) Lengths of Stay and Discharge dispositions after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of robotic-assisted and manual techniques. J Knee Surg 36(4):404–410. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ofa SA, Ross BJ, Flick TR, Patel AH, Sherman WF (2020) Robotic total knee arthroplasty vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: a nationwide database study. Arthroplast Today 6(4):1001–1008e3 Published 2020 Nov 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2020.09.014

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Heinz T, Eidmann A, Anderson P et al (2023) Trends in computer-assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty in Germany: an analysis based on the operative procedure classification system between 2010 to 2021. J Clin Med 12(2):549 Published 2023 Jan 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020549

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang HY, Seon JK, Shin YJ, Lim HA, Song EK (2017) Robotic total knee arthroplasty with a cruciate-retaining implant: a 10-Year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Surg 9(2):169–176. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.2.169

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hua Y, Salcedo J (2022) Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty. PLoS ONE 17(11):e0277980 Published 2022 Nov 28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rajan PV, Khlopas A, Klika A, Molloy R, Krebs V, Piuzzi NS (2022) The cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted Versus Manual total knee arthroplasty: a Markov Model-based evaluation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 30(4):168–176. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Vikram A Aggarwal, Joshua Sun & Senthil N Sambandam

Authors
  1. Vikram A Aggarwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joshua Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Senthil N Sambandam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikram A Aggarwal.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

None.

Informed consent

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aggarwal, V.A., Sun, J. & Sambandam, S.N. Outcomes following robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 144, 2223–2227 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05231-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05231-7

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Vikram A Aggarwal View author profile